Search found 835 matches

by Ornello
Tue Jan 16, 2018 10:13 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: 120 Tri-x @ 1600 in HC-110
Replies: 3
Views: 70

Re: 120 Tri-x @ 1600 in HC-110

Your film is two stops underexposed. Nothing can be done. If you had overexposed it by the same margin, there would be no problem, and no change to processing would be needed. B&W negative film has no underexposure latitude, but about five stops of overexposure latitude. If you make the best prints ...
by Ornello
Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:11 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: 120 Tri-x @ 1600 in HC-110
Replies: 3
Views: 70

Re: 120 Tri-x @ 1600 in HC-110

You have under-exposed your film. Nothing can be done.
by Ornello
Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:13 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: FX39
Replies: 5
Views: 13149

Re: FX39

pirateoversixty wrote:
Thu Jul 27, 2017 1:09 pm
ornello
you have had 2 1/2 years to putz around with this developer. anything to report yet?
jim
Have not processed any film in 10 years. I hope to again soon.
by Ornello
Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:29 am
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: How to properly make PaRodinal
Replies: 30
Views: 69140

Re: How to properly make PaRodinal

Mixing rodinal and xtol probably did not work out in the long run. Haven't seen anything about it lately on photo.net or apug. jim In very few cases will mixing two very different developers give you a result 'intermediate' between the two. The developing agent in Rodinal needs a strong alkali to w...
by Ornello
Mon Aug 01, 2016 11:04 am
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: How to properly make PaRodinal
Replies: 30
Views: 69140

Re: How to properly make PaRodinal

pirateoversixty wrote:Kenny:
Your getting a little more complex than I would go, but I did consider adding a little sea salt to the basic formula. Have you tried combining parodinal with xtol yet? This mixture seems to be popular in some quarters
Jim.
Mixing developers using different alkalis is not sensible.
by Ornello
Thu May 05, 2016 9:32 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: Pan F+ in HC 110
Replies: 10
Views: 26720

Re: Pan F+ in HC 110

pirateoversixty wrote:Ornello:
What times would you suggest, and dilution? I have found Pan F+ to be a hassle, but I am stubborn, sort of. Might like to try it again.
jim m.

I would have no idea.
by Ornello
Fri Apr 22, 2016 9:30 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: Kodak Panchromatic Separation 2238
Replies: 1
Views: 6042

Re: Kodak Panchromatic Separation 2238

Hi everyone! I'm searching dev times for Kodak Panchromatic Separation (ISO 25) 2238 film, but i can't find it (the Kodak page only show information of how develop this film with machine), does any one has developed this film in D-76 (stock)? In this site i found that someone developer with D-76 (1...
by Ornello
Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:10 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: chlorobromide paper
Replies: 1
Views: 6884

Re: chlorobromide paper

k1.obata wrote:I would like to use the chlorobromide paper for print. Which light of this app would be appropriate ?
Huh?
by Ornello
Fri Feb 05, 2016 8:43 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: Pan F+ in HC 110
Replies: 10
Views: 26720

Re: Pan F+ in HC 110

I would not use HC110 with Pan-F, unless it was highly diluted.
by Ornello
Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:58 am
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 stand
Replies: 12
Views: 25057

Re: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 st

pirateoversixty wrote:Ornello:
I assume this is the fx-39 you referred to in you January post last year. I am guessing that you are finding it meets your standards vis a vis other developers.
Jim

It is very good, perhaps the sharpest developer I have ever used, with very fine grain.
by Ornello
Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:52 am
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 stand
Replies: 12
Views: 25057

Re: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 st

What dev times are you using with FX39? These images from films developed in FX39 look good. https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=adox%20fx39&view_all=1 Jim, your link doesn't seem to be working. Basically, I use the times given by Paterson for 1+9 dilution, but dilute 1+14 instead. I also rate the ...
by Ornello
Thu Dec 31, 2015 1:41 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 stand
Replies: 12
Views: 25057

Re: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 st

Lots of folks use SD very successfully. Give it a try, there's more than one opinion out there. http://www.apug.org/forums/search.php?searchid=5205381 I use gentle, minimal agitation, two inversions (with rotation) once per minute. I also fill the tank almost to the top, leaving only a small amount...
by Ornello
Thu Dec 24, 2015 10:14 am
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 stand
Replies: 12
Views: 25057

Re: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 st

probably totally unrelated to OP, but have been browsing old copies of "darkroom and creative camera techniques", and in the nov/dec 1989 issue, Phil Davis gives his take on agitation, and what causes streaks and so forth. his desire for even development resulted in his "reinvention" of tube proces...
by Ornello
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:02 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 stand
Replies: 12
Views: 25057

Re: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 st

(yawn) here we go again. If you would like to view a discussion between jay de fehr and ornello, go back aways. they fought stand to a standstill. can't agree with orny on streaking, but I have found inconsistent results with stand. I used hc-110 119 parts water to 1 part syrup. some good, some not...
by Ornello
Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:08 pm
Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
Topic: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 stand
Replies: 12
Views: 25057

Re: pushing ulterafine extreme 400 to 1600 with a gsd10 st

Stand development was used with glass plates in a horizontal position. Attempting it with roll film in a tank will cause streaking, as the development by-products (which suppress development because they are acidic) are heavier than the developer solution and will run down the film drawn by gravity ...