KennyE 777 Panthermic Developers

Film Photography & Darkroom discussion

Moderator: Keith Tapscott.

KennyE
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 6:49 am
Location: Waterford, Michigan USA

KennyE 777 Panthermic Developers

Postby KennyE » Thu Sep 05, 2013 12:36 pm

I love "Rodinal", it is a great developer that to this day, till surprises us as to what it can do; and what can be done with it.

But it was one of Digitaltruth's Forum members (Ornello) that gave me the support to move into developing a new developer. And I thank him.

So I researched for days and weeks until I found the Defender/Harvey formula. Being retired, it gave me the time to search the web until I had located it. And I thank DuPont for their assistance. Because like I was told. If you are going to spend millions of dollars to purchase a company. Make sure that your investment is protected.

And there is no better place to protect your investment than USPTO.

Defender 777 is not an easy developer to produce. The standard amateur photographer would be hard press to do it. But when you are retired and have a chemical //background// and your retired friends have one as well. It becomes very easy to do.

All you need is the materials and equipment.

I could have made Defender 777. But I would've had to purchase some more equipment, and it is expensive. And I had no intentions of producing it for a living. I just wanted to see if I could do it cheaply.

I made the developer my way. Some of the operations were made simple to get to the final stage. But my overall test were very good for the final developer. The problem is..., that I never used Defender 777, and do not know what to look for, out of this developer.

So I really need some help.

I can provide only 1 10oz bottles of KennyE 777 for per person to test for me and I will pay for shipping. But here is the catch. I only have 4 bottles.

A. You must use Defender 777/Harvey 777 as your go to developer, with at lease 5 years of using it.
B. You must keep records on the use of KennyE 777, and share the results with me. Including photos. Please no nudes
C. You must reside in America, and be 21 years of age or older
D. You must accept all liabilities.

If you have not and do not use Defender 777/Harvey 777. Please do not reply. I do not want to waste my small amount of resources. Because once the testing is done. I will post the formula.

I require some serious Defender 777/Harvey 777 users for these test. So, PM me if you are.

Thank You

KennyE
Last edited by KennyE on Fri Oct 04, 2013 4:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.


Ornello
Posts: 833
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: KennyE 777

Postby Ornello » Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:10 pm

I remember this stuff, which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s. I never used it, but that was because I was a fan of Ethol UFG at that time.

I will continue to work with FX-15 Acutol-S, since I use mostly 400 ISO films.

KennyE
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 6:49 am
Location: Waterford, Michigan USA

Re: KennyE 777

Postby KennyE » Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:34 pm

Yea, I have a can of UFG, I will one day get to use it. I never used it because it was out of my budget in 1959. My allowance was only $1.50. So I used Dektol. Then in the 1960's I used D-76 and Microdol-X.

Thank You


KennyE

foolscape
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:01 am
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

Re: KennyE 777

Postby foolscape » Sat Sep 07, 2013 9:18 pm

I've used Harvey's 777 from Photographers' Formulary. The problem is that there is some disagreement over the exact formula. There's a formula on The Unblinking Eye which uses glycin as one of its developers, and I think that's the one that PF uses, but some folks on LF.info say that there was no Glycin in the original Harvey's 777. It's not my go to developer, though. I use it for occasionally night shots where detail in the highlights is critical.

--Gary

KennyE
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 6:49 am
Location: Waterford, Michigan USA

Re: KennyE 777

Postby KennyE » Sat Sep 07, 2013 9:42 pm

The formula being sold by Photography Formulary, is Germain's fine grain developer. It is indeed an outstanding developer, but it is not Defender/Harvey 777.

It has become clear that most people today are using Germain's fine grain developer from Photography Formulary. I am not trying to sell a product or make money. I am merely trying to improve my discovery of the Defender/Harvey 777 formula. So here it is...., if you decide to use any of the formulas, you assume all liabilities. Yet I request that you leave a comment or two about your experience with them or which ever one that you decide to use or test out.

Click on the link, to get started: http://adfasi.blogspot.com/


Thank You


KennyE

irivlin
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 8:17 am

Re: KennyE 777 Panthermic Developers

Postby irivlin » Sat Sep 10, 2016 1:23 am

Kenny,
Do you have any further news regarding your panthermic/777 developer substitute?
Although I haven't used Harveys 777, I used to develop with AB55, which I understand is almost the same. AB55, unfortunately, hasn't been made for many years.
Kind regards,
Ian
Queensland
Australia
PS, I don't know how reliable the Digital Truth message server is, so please feel free to send me an SMS to +61 427 711-744 if you prefer.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest