F-76 equivalents

Film Photography & Darkroom discussion

Moderator: Keith Tapscott.

Post Reply
rmolson
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:49 am
Location: Mansfield Ohio

F-76 equivalents

Post by rmolson » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:54 pm

F-76

I have been using F76 at the 1:9 dilution for some time which is about the equivalent to D-76 stock. I can’t seem to find the equivalent 1:1 dilution on the giant developing chart. IT shows a doubling of film speed and use of a higher temperature. I am not interested in pushing the film I want to try to get some the sharpness benefits of the old D-76 at 1:1.
Any one have any experience working at these dilutions


Digitaltruth
Site Admin
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:24 pm
Contact:

Post by Digitaltruth » Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:21 pm

Try 1+14
Digitaltruth Photo
https://www.digitaltruth.com

Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Re: F-76 equivalents

Post by Keith Tapscott. » Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:14 pm

rmolson wrote:F-76

I have been using F76 at the 1:9 dilution for some time which is about the equivalent to D-76 stock. I can’t seem to find the equivalent 1:1 dilution on the giant developing chart. IT shows a doubling of film speed and use of a higher temperature. I am not interested in pushing the film I want to try to get some the sharpness benefits of the old D-76 at 1:1.
Any one have any experience working at these dilutions
Despite the product name, I am sceptical that it performs the same as D-76. It`s probably more like Ilford Ilfosol or Fotospeed FD-10. Perhaps Lowell Huff will comment if he reads this thread.

Lowell Huff
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:09 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA 90061
Contact:

Post by Lowell Huff » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:48 pm

Since we have been making this formula and its predicessor, F 60 Film Developer, for thirty years, Ilfords DD-X is very similar to our formula. It is a phenidone HQ formula and does not resemble the Metol HQ formula of KODAK D76. It is much more sophisticated in design and purpose than that 1920s formula.

Post Reply