Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Film Photography & Darkroom discussion

Moderator: Keith Tapscott.

Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Keith Tapscott. » Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:10 am

Fuji-film will discontinue manufacturing Quickloads in April 2010 according to these links.
http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPa ... age=872222
http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPa ... age=872223


foolscape
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:01 am
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby foolscape » Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:58 am

Of course... One more... Why not... First Readyloads, now Quickloads.

Now I have to backpack with 20 film holders.

Very angry...
--Gary

Ornello
Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Ornello » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:57 pm

foolscape wrote:Of course... One more... Why not... First Readyloads, now Quickloads.

Now I have to backpack with 20 film holders.

Very angry...
--Gary
That's why Barnack invented the Leica.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/oskar-barnack.htm

Here ya go:

http://us.leica-camera.com/photography/ ... m7_hermes/

Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Keith Tapscott. » Fri Dec 25, 2009 9:25 am

Ornello wrote:
foolscape wrote:Of course... One more... Why not... First Readyloads, now Quickloads.

Now I have to backpack with 20 film holders.

Very angry...
--Gary
That's why Barnack invented the Leica.

Here ya go:

http://us.leica-camera.com/photography/ ... m7_hermes/
Hey, stop posting those links, the Leica MP (A la carte) is far too tempting and highly likely to drain my savings account. :x

Ornello
Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Ornello » Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:04 pm

Keith Tapscott. wrote:
Ornello wrote:
foolscape wrote:Of course... One more... Why not... First Readyloads, now Quickloads.

Now I have to backpack with 20 film holders.

Very angry...
--Gary
That's why Barnack invented the Leica.

Here ya go:

http://us.leica-camera.com/photography/ ... m7_hermes/
Hey, stop posting those links, the Leica MP (A la carte) is far too tempting and highly likely to drain my savings account. :x
Yep!

foolscape
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:01 am
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby foolscape » Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:39 am

Unfortunately, 35mm negs don't enlarge to 20x24 very well.

--Gary

Ornello
Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Ornello » Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:42 pm

foolscape wrote:Unfortunately, 35mm negs don't enlarge to 20x24 very well.

--Gary
LOL.

Leica negs do.

foolscape
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:01 am
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby foolscape » Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:11 am

Ornello wrote:LOL.

Leica negs do.
Folks have been trying to sell me on Leica cameras for years. Someday, I'll have to see what all the fuss is about.

--Gary

Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Keith Tapscott. » Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:40 pm

foolscape wrote:
Ornello wrote:LOL.

Leica negs do.
Folks have been trying to sell me on Leica cameras for years. Someday, I'll have to see what all the fuss is about.

--Gary
I wouldn`t sell your LF Cameras, but you might find the photographs of the late James Ravilious of interest.
http://www.jamesravilious.com/
He used to use a Leica M3 camera and preferred the old non-coated Leitz Elmar (3.5cm & 5.0cm) lenses to the newer multi-coated lenses for aesthetic reasons. His film stock was Kodak Tri-X rated around E.I.250 and slightly under developed in D-76, 1:1. He felt that the non-coated lenses gave a much better tone-gradation than the newer lenses, which he felt were too contrasty for "contre-jour" lighting. I have seen some of his prints in an exhibition and they are very good. They are enlarged around 10"x15" inches and although some grain is noticeable when looking close, it doesn`t affect the crisp definition of the subject matter.

Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Keith Tapscott. » Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:43 am

Putting this thread back on topic, there may be a glimmer of hope for owners of Readyload and Quickload film holders.

http://www.apug.org/forums/forum44/7013 ... post918797 (See the 1st post).

foolscape
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:01 am
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby foolscape » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:46 am

Keith Tapscott. wrote:I wouldn`t sell your LF Cameras, but you might find the photographs of the late James Ravilious of interest.
They are interesting, considering that I've been moving away from uncoated optics. Occasionally, I do have need of a 35mm camera for more "candid" images, where mirror slap would be a problem. A leica would fit that bill. That said, I can't afford one.

Also, I read about the refillable Quickloads on LF.info, and it seems like a good thing. Apparently, they need some startup money.

--Gary

Ornello
Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Ornello » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:58 pm

foolscape wrote:
Keith Tapscott. wrote:I wouldn`t sell your LF Cameras, but you might find the photographs of the late James Ravilious of interest.
They are interesting, considering that I've been moving away from uncoated optics. Occasionally, I do have need of a 35mm camera for more "candid" images, where mirror slap would be a problem. A leica would fit that bill. That said, I can't afford one.

Also, I read about the refillable Quickloads on LF.info, and it seems like a good thing. Apparently, they need some startup money.

--Gary
Oh come on...you can find used Ms quite reasonable...starting around $500:

http://www.keh.com/Class-Products/1/LM/2/79301/WG.aspx

miha
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:42 am

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby miha » Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:04 pm

Ornello wrote: Oh come on...you can find used Ms quite reasonable...starting around $500:

http://www.keh.com/Class-Products/1/LM/2/79301/WG.aspx
+ CLA + lens or two = $1500

Ornello
Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby Ornello » Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:21 pm

miha wrote:
Ornello wrote: Oh come on...you can find used Ms quite reasonable...starting around $500:

http://www.keh.com/Class-Products/1/LM/2/79301/WG.aspx
+ CLA + lens or two = $1500
Yeah, and your point is? Look at the prices of digital cameras today...

miha
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:42 am

Re: Fujifilm discontinue Quickloads.

Postby miha » Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:45 pm

Ornello wrote:
miha wrote:
Ornello wrote: Oh come on...you can find used Ms quite reasonable...starting around $500:

http://www.keh.com/Class-Products/1/LM/2/79301/WG.aspx
+ CLA + lens or two = $1500
Yeah, and your point is? Look at the prices of digital cameras today...
$1500, not $500.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest