Kodak Plus-X ASA400

Film Photography & Darkroom discussion

Moderator: Keith Tapscott.

Jono
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 6:49 pm

Kodak Plus-X ASA400

Postby Jono » Wed Apr 14, 2010 6:55 pm

So, i was in a bit of a rush when loading film and shooting the other day and had forgotten to adjust my ISO from 400 to 125 while using Plus-X 125.
Long story short, I was looking to develop some of that film today only to discover that the Digital Truth as well as an extended search of the internet came up negative for helpful information regarding a developing time for Plus-X shot at 400.

I now ask you if you have ever stumbled upon a developing time that might work for this predicament.
(maybe using acufine or xtol? that's what i am working with at the moment.)

Thank you very much for any input.


Ornello
Posts: 833
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: Kodak Plus-X ASA400

Postby Ornello » Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:38 pm

Jono wrote:So, i was in a bit of a rush when loading film and shooting the other day and had forgotten to adjust my ISO from 400 to 125 while using Plus-X 125.
Long story short, I was looking to develop some of that film today only to discover that the Digital Truth as well as an extended search of the internet came up negative for helpful information regarding a developing time for Plus-X shot at 400.

I now ask you if you have ever stumbled upon a developing time that might work for this predicament.
(maybe using acufine or xtol? that's what i am working with at the moment.)

Thank you very much for any input.
Film comes in various rated speeds for a reason. Faster films are grainier, fine-grained films require more light. It is not really possible to salvage underexposed film through changes in processing time or special developers. Changes in processing time affect the contrast of the overall image, but cannot create density where insufficient exposure has been given.

Film speeds in use today call for the minimum exposure to produce acceptable results. This is by design, to keep exposure at the practical minimum.

Increasing exposure over this amount does little harm if it is less than three stops. There will be some loss of highlight detail but nothing disastrous. On the other hand, underexposure, even a little, cannot be tolerated. The film simply won't record anything in the deep shadows. The mid-tones will record where the shadows should be, and the highlights will be recorded where the mid-tones should be. In other words, almost all the 'margin for error' lies on the side of increased exposure.

You have under-exposed your film by about 1 2/3 stops. That simply cannot be remedied. My advice is to process the film is D-76 1:1 at the recommended time.

The popular notion that films can be uprated or down-rated is largely myth. Certain developers (fine-grain developers such as Perceptol or Microdol-X) can reduce the sensitivity of an emulsion and thus require more exposure, but little can be done in the other direction. For many years developer companies touted speed-increasing properties of their products. Acufine boasted that you could get Tri-X to achieve speeds of 1200. This is a lie. These products used phenidone instead of metol but that in itself allows only a very small increase in speed, maybe 1/3-1/2 stop at most, and then only with the faster films. The speed of films such as Plus-X Pan will hardly be affected at all. This is a lost cause.
Last edited by Ornello on Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Digitaltruth
Site Admin
Posts: 264
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Kodak Plus-X ASA400

Postby Digitaltruth » Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:58 pm

If you return to the Massive Dev Chart, you will notice that there is a Push Processing chart listed on the left: http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?doc=pushproc

This chart provides guidelines where no specific time is listed.
--Jon Mided

Digitaltruth Photo
http://www.digitaltruth.com

Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Re: Kodak Plus-X ASA400

Postby Keith Tapscott. » Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:02 pm

Jono wrote:So, i was in a bit of a rush when loading film and shooting the other day and had forgotten to adjust my ISO from 400 to 125 while using Plus-X 125.

I now ask you if you have ever stumbled upon a developing time that might work for this predicament.
(maybe using acufine or xtol? that's what i am working with at the moment.)

Thank you very much for any input.
The highest true effective speed yield from a Kodak developer is to use T-Max developer diluted 1+4.
As already mentioned, these `true speed gain`s are actually very minimal.
The Kodak technical publication for Plus-X should help you to decide how to process your film for uprated ISO/ASA.

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professi ... /f4018.pdf


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests